The argument was further supported by a video that had to
demonstrate that, over the years, the Delftse Hout has become a
city ??park had become comparable to the Vondelpark in Amsterdam.
The defense discussed the concept of nudity in detail. And that the naked human
body absolutely does not have to be shocking. Reference was also made
to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of the
Naked Rambler,
who did have the right of "free expression" (= being naked), but that this is too extreme
transit by appearing naked everywhere.
Furthermore, the defense argued that the Public Prosecution Service is inadmissible,
because the nude recreationists have been ticketed for the (alleged) sexual
to prevent nuisance in the area. This is contrary to the
principle that legal remedies are only used for the
purpose for which they are intended. (détournement de pouvoir).
The verdict is on January 18, 2017.
Relevant links:
NFN
Lawyers request acquittal in Delftse Hout case
To sunbathe naked in Delftse Hout or not? Nude holidaymakers back in court